Two primary project management methodologies exist in the world: Prince 2 and PMI. By fully utilizing these methodologies, you can build an excellent ocean ship or an engine for a jet plane. However, only some companies carry out such complex and technologically advanced projects.
Companies mostly execute dozens of smaller projects that last from a few weeks to several months, rarely longer. Prince2 and PMI recommend that these methodologies be “tailored” to the types and complexity of the projects a given company executes, empowering you to avoid excessive bureaucracy or “overcomplication” in your project management.
Many companies have a “project management manual.” It’s not just a set of rules and sample documents but a valuable tool that guides everyone in the company in approaching project implementation successfully.
The project sponsor is one of the most influential people determining the project’s success. However, the sponsor must not be a “statistician.” Such a sponsor does not give much.
A good sponsor should not be operationally involved in the project. However, he should get involved at a high level to understand what is going on in the project, whether it is going well or badly, have good contact with the project manager, and actively make the required decisions.
The sponsor “thwarts” the obstacles before the project and allows it to move forward. The world literature unequivocally states that one of the main factors in project failure is the lack of involvement of senior management in projects.
The project team should not consist of random people. The team members should present a set of competencies that will allow the project to be implemented well. Suppose we engage an inexperienced project manager for an important project and give him the management of people with inadequate competencies. In that case, it is as if we immediately burned a chicken in the oven—such a project will not succeed.
The company’s management, the project sponsor, should be 100% convinced that the people delegated to carry out a particular project have a 100% chance of successful implementation. If there is no such conviction, it can be compared to a roulette game. It is agreed that the result will not be black or red, i.e., as unambiguous as in roulette, but we can be sure that if such an approach takes place in the company often, it means that many projects – just like many roulette bets – will fail.
Implementing any project involves resources, and those resources cost money. Another undisputable fact is that each company can simultaneously carry out a limited number of projects. Finally, an equally undisputable fact is that companies have many project ideas.
This means that every company should take great care in selecting the projects it wants to pursue. Here, for example, is what one international logistics company operating in Poland stated:
“(…) we have more than fifty ideas for potential projects, while at the same time, we have the internal capacity for about five major projects – we need a tool that will allow us to objectively select those ideas that have the greatest impact on building sustainable value for our company.”
This company decided to build a scoring model. Such a model contains a series of questions based on which each project is evaluated, and within each question, each project is assigned an appropriate number of points. We operate on two main dimensions. The first is “business benefits,” while the second is “degree of comprehensiveness of the project.” Ideas are compared, and those that score most favorably become projects. Such a selection process still has the advantage of being primarily objective and minimizing the influence of people with solid character “pushing” their solutions.
Unless some legislative condition drives the project, its implementation should always focus on achieving specific business objectives. This means its business objectives should be defined and written down before starting a project. Why? Because more is needed to describe only the required product and scope of the project. It is necessary to know what this product is supposed to bring to the organization.
This approach influences greater creativity of project teams, who know what they are doing and what business results will be achieved for the organization. Another thing is the project sponsor’s responsibility – the sponsor should always focus on what business effects the project will realize. The project manager should focus on delivering the project product. Inappropriate proportions, both should be interested in one and the other.
Many project managers, sponsors, and others pay too little attention to defining project expected outcomes. Human nature is such that people prefer to act immediately—to have the proverbial wind in their hair. The Prince2 project management methodology says unequivocally that every project must have at least two phases: planning and implementation.
Practice shows that the planning phase needs to be addressed. Also neglected is defining the expected project results/products well. Why is this such a big problem? Creating a good project schedule and defining tasks and budgets is easier when we have a vague idea of what we want to do. Another issue is that it is difficult for us to assess at the end of the project whether we have been successful, as there is no clear benchmark in the form of a predefined product.
There is another essential argument—the lack of a clear definition of the result/product at the beginning of the project causes the project to be adjusted too often during the project. This, on the one hand, hurts the motivation of the project team and, on the other hand, most often forces the organization to incur more than necessary costs to complete the project.
Tip 6 discusses the need to define the project’s expected outcome/product well. This is the absolute starting point for creating a good project plan. In the Prince2 methodology, this approach is called Product-Based Planning.
It is based on the fact that after defining what the project’s products and sub-products are supposed to look like, we start planning the tasks that will realize these products. With this approach, we know exactly what we want to achieve and focus the definition of project tasks on that. The next step is to create a project budget, define the tasks’ responsibilities and duration, and create a risk plan. All this and the Project Charter (the so-called Project Charter) comprise the project plan.
A refined project plan is essential because we refer to it at every moment of the project. With a plan, we know if we are behind schedule or over budget, which is the essence of project management. Finally, without a good plan, it isn’t easy to know whether the tasks carried out and expenses incurred are necessary. A good project plan is the basis of good project management and determines its success.
Effective project implementation requires providing project teams with practical project management tools. When we say tools, we mean providing a dedicated IT system that supports project management and integrates all aspects of project management.
In particular, the project management software’s functionalities should be dedicated directly to the project manager and the project team. The system’s tools are sufficient to plan and execute a single project.
These tasks are among the main tasks of the project manager and the sponsor. Earlier, we talked about the need to create a good project plan. Monitoring the degree of implementation of the project refers precisely to this plan. Monitoring means that:
It will be no revelation that projects can be managed better or worse. What we are concerned with is achieving excellence in project management, and this – in addition to providing the organization with the right project tools and resources – requires systematically building an organizational culture that promotes and pays a lot of attention to good project management, called project-driven organization. Here are some of the elements involved:
Implementing all the tips described above is complex and cannot be done quickly. However, implementing them in the right time horizon will guarantee that the existing organization will change—its processes will start to run more efficiently, people will be motivated, and the company will achieve better financial results.